Thanks to our quadrennial celebration of electing a new liar…er…leader every 4 years, a new form of informative, ignorance surfaces. It is known as a Presidential Debate. It should not be confused with an intellectual masturbate, whereas top secret stupidity is revealed to the voters. The last debate exposed the public to a ghastly ritual of migrant, island workers who cook up and eat dogs (and cats). The candidates go out of their way, exposing their competitor’s personality flaws and lack of awareness when trashy things occur on their watch. The revelation of dog devouring in Springfield, Ohio by the slightly demented Geriatric General, was akin to giving out US launch codes to Putin. The American public was disturbed, to say the least, while the cackling hen cackled hen-ily. This revelation caused a neck-jerking, emotional WTF Moment for the undecided voters that tend to hold on to their undecided stances. So, who’s lying? Well?…. this situation is really an ongoing experiment sponsored jointly by the US Environmental Studies and the US Beef Council. They want to know the methane discharge rates of dog farts and human farts after consuming dogs (and cats). This ongoing study has now been compromised by letting the cat (and dogs) out of the bag. Why these candidates will stoop to such bottom feeding tactics is beyond the comprehension of most voters. BUT, all is fair in love and disgusting elections. Scientists are scouring the data from this stealthy experiment to see if eating pets is sustainable due to lower cholesterol levels and pet-tides in their meat. Dogs are rarely fed growth hormones and antibiotics, so they may, in fact, be a healthier alternative to consuming cows. These debates need to be screened so as not to damage ongoing scientific studies and upset the horse apple-cart that is spewed out by Presidential Candidates in their poor attempts to be the Top Dog.


